Can Creativity Be Taught?
Nope.
(They told me in Journalism 101 to get to the point quickly).
I admit, it’s a bit harsh, so lemmee back up a bit.
Part of my role – and Jeremy’s role – is to “foster creativity, at all levels, throughout the network.” That’s part of our mandate, with the help of others across the Global Catalyst Network. BUT, that’s not teaching. That’s elevating. Inspiring. Facilitating. Not Teaching. And there’s a difference.
Why do some view the possibility of teaching creativity as important? A few reasons:
1. Most importantly, creativity is the centerpiece of our competitive differentiation. Creativity is our currency; it’s what sets us apart from other agencies, and creative output will become more and more important as consumers become more marketing savvy. This is an oversimplification to be sure, but broadly speaking, the more great creative output you have, the greater the chance that you’re going to strike gold with ideas. (The good news is that as an agency, we’re already pretty great at this).
2. Creativity is the new sense of humor. Everyone wants to believe they’re creative. And when you tell people they’re not, especially in this business, it’s an attack on their worth to the organization – not to mention their self worth.
3. Creativity – or lack thereof – has far reaching implications. Creativity influences problem solving, execution of strategy, counsel to our clients, application of new tools (e.g., in the social media realm), etc. Heavy stuff.
4. You can teach most other things in our business. Writing, media pitching, financial oversight, etc. – all things critical to our business. Why shouldn’t you be able to teach something so fundamentally important to our industry?
Why CAN’T you teach creativity? Why is that so elusive? Well, to begin with, creativity is poorly defined area of expertise. We’ve discussed this before – it’s similar to the pornography test: I Know It When I See It. Compounding that issue, creativity also has degrees of usefulness and appropriateness. What’s creative for HP isn’t going to be creative for H&M. Creative output is very subjective and has no guidelines that transcend any particular task or assignment. The nebulous nature of creativity makes it nearly impossible to standardize – and therefore, impossible to measure quantitatively. So, developing a formalized structure that would allow instruction becomes problematic.
So, we’re stuck, right? Not exactly. Because here’s the secret. Most people ARE creative. Most people have that creative spark. Most people who aren’t seen as creative haven’t been given the opportunity to maximize their creative power.
I’ve seen it first hand. A team member isn’t viewed as creative, based on a multitude of factors that might limit their creative output – introverted personality, fear of ridicule, an unwelcome environment. That person is then consistently left out of creative sessions and/or given assignments with limited creative potential – thereby exasperating the issue. Before you know it, that person gains a reputation as “not creative” and is never given the chance to flourish.
So what do we do to draw creativity out of these people? How can we maximize their creativity? How do we give people the tools to build and express their own creativity?
I’ll tell you next year…
Happy Holidays,
Marc
